Friday, October 1, 2010

"Born and Raised in a North Korean Gulag" vs "1984"


Nowadays we don’t imagine ourselves under any totalitarian authority. Although humans are prone to feeling that they are being oppressed by some greater power, it was never to an extent that was presented in We or 1984. This New York Times article, “Born and Raised in a North Korean Gulag” presents many shocking details of prison life that resemble that of the life in 1984. The same totalitarian ideals are presented in prison life, as well as their torture and inquisition methods. Many details in Shin Dong Hyok’s description are tangential to the descriptions in we, which is very shocking to readers including myself.

The first similarity between this article and 1984 is the relationship that each had with their mother. Shin states that he had no love for his mother due to what he had to go through because of her.  Winston similarly had a peculiar relationship with his mother, especially depicted in his flashbacks throughout the story. When Shin’s mother was being hanged, he did not feel any sadness and instead avoided his mother’s eyes. Winston, like Shin, did not understand how to handle his relationship with his mother. He was unaware of whether or not she was alive, but had no direct need to find her. Upon meeting a woman who could possibly have been his mother in the prison, Winston’s reaction was not normal for someone who may have just found his or her mother. Both Winston and Shin have relationship issues, possibly a result of the harsh circumstances they were forced to endure.

Both Winston and Shin were born into a world where there was some sort of oppression, and therefore were unaware that there was any other way of living. Shin states that he thought everyone lived this way, and therefore did not try to revolt. He said that he never found anything ‘unfair’. Shin, like Winston, was given information of the outside world. Winston and Shin share similar reactions to this information of ‘outside worlds’ and are both overcome with the need to experience it. Winston dealt with it by keeping a diary, and plotting against the government with his accomplice. Shin dealt with it by finding ways to escape out of the prison so that he could experience this ‘free’ world he had never known of.

Both Winston and Shin were in atmospheres where humans were deprived of regular human feelings and standards. Shin was used to seeing people getting beaten up, and therefore was less prone to being sensitive. Shin was also deprived of proper education, which is similar to the control over language and writing in 1984. The use of propaganda is also present in both the North Korean prison as well as in 1984. In addition, means of inquisition are also similar in the sense that they use brutal and painful methods to gain answers.  

The idea that a world similar to that of 1984 exists in our world is a scary thought. People who  have been born into such harsh conditions have no knowledge of the outside world, and therefore don’t feel that anything is wrong. It makes one wonder whether our generation of human beings are also living in the darkness of another ‘outside world’. 

6 comments:

  1. I like how, at the end of your blog, you bring up the concept that maybe we are “living in the darkness of another world.” You bring up a lot of the similarities between the gulag and 1984; do you think you could delve a bit deeper? For example, what I found most interesting or most striking about the article was the part where it talked about Shin’s desire to go back to the gulag. Could this relate to 1984? Do you think that Winston or any other Party member could be happy in another world, free from the oppression with which they had lived for so long? After they, or even we, get used to a situation that we have never lived without, can we really be happy with another?
    Just as you asked the ‘bigger question’ at the end of your blog, so did I at the end of mine. It relates the idea that we believe Shin’s life in the gulag to have been simply horrid and unnatural, but for him it was normal, even preferable to our own world. It just goes to show that one persons dystopia is another’s utopia. For example, our world, your world/my world, is by no means perfect, but we were born in it, it is all we have ever known, with all its imperfections. If there is a better world out there, on mars or Pluto, could we live there comfortably, or would we always be longing for our earth, for our home? I guess my big question is, would we be content in a perfect world?

    I would really love to hear your opinion on this. I think you have great things to say!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have definitely helped me see a different point of view, although i drew comparisons between 1984 I did not see such strong connections with how Shin and Winston handle their relationships. You really compared and contrasted both ideas and then connected it with a bigger picture, so it has a nice flow. I agree with Nina with what do you think about the fact that Shin wanted to go back?

    Additionally Nina i was wondering what is a "perfect world" and can there ever be a perfect world? As different people would just find things to complain about. I think the whole idea of a perfect world is subjective. So I think at least my answer to your question would be that there is no such thing as a perfect world and hence none of us would ever be happy. Like yevgeny zamyatin said "revolutions are infinite."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anuraag--

    Pooja, I remember you and I having a discussion about freedom, and coming to a conclusion that humans have not witnessed total freedom. So do you think that there are societies where pure freedom is inevitable?
    On the other hand, who do you think enforces restrictions on our daily life, or guides us to 'the successful path.' Is the social norm made by the government, or us as a society?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Pooja.
    __
    The correlations you talk about between Shin and Winston are really similar, you mention how they were both living in oppression, but you say Winston was also "unaware that there was any other way of living". I always thought that Winston did know how life was previously, which was the cause for his dissatisfaction for his life in the present. Winston mentions many times that he very vaguely remembered a time when things were different when he was younger, when there weren't as many wars? Winston was unhappy with the way of life in Oceania from before the beginning of the novel because he knew there was a difference in life previously and life now. And though his "regular human feelings" were restricted, he still managed to feel them didn't he? As he fell in love with Julia (or at least claimed to), and as he felt hate towards the Party, he was feeling what was not allowed but feeling it all the same, whereas Shin, according to the article, couldn't.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The similarities between 1984 and this article are definitely plentiful. In response to Nina's and Saumya's comments, I feel that the reason Shin wanted to go back corresponds to Winston's constant apprehensions throughout the entire novel. He is constantly doubting whether he should continue writing in his diary, and constantly thinks about being turned in. He wishes he could be like everyone else so he can stop living in fear.
    I feel that this concept is demonstrated more in We, where D-503 openly writes about his desires to return back to the way he used to think and feel.
    I agree with Saumya's point about the existence of a perfect world, for I feel that there isn't one. Humans will never be satisfied with what they have, for it is a part of their nature.

    Anuraag, I feel that this 'social norm' is made by the society, as demonstrated in both this article and 1984. When living in a prison camp this long, Shin felt as though those standards of living are what were considered 'normal' and therefore felt no need to revolt. Similarly, the people in 1984 are just followers of the path society is telling them to follow, showing how absolute freedom is impossible.

    Aishwarya, you bring up an interesting point as to why Winston felt the need to revolt whereas Shin did not. The very idea that Winston had a taste of 'the good life' didn't allow him to forget it, and he therefore had the constant urge to get it back. Shin on the other hand who had never had such experiences wanted to return back to the camp, which was the only thing that he knew (relating back to Nina and Saumya's point).

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with your saying that D-503 demonstrates a desire to return to how his life was previously. In your response to Nina and Saumya, you say "D-503 openly writes about his desires to return back to the way he used to think and feel", wouldn't that be because D-503 like Shin was told or influenced by someone else (1-330) on how life outside, or apart from the One State/prison camp is? It wasn’t something they came to understand on their own.
    If D-503 was given a choice, he wouldn't have wanted to change the way the thought or felt, in fact he hated that he had changed. Winston on the other hand was already against the Party. This gives D-503 more reason to want to switch back to his 'previous self', because this change in him causes problems and fear. But Winston always knew that he would get caught one day. Winston didn’t want to go back (as Shin, or D-503) because there was no previous opinion, he had always hated the party, until he was forced to accept them in the end…

    ReplyDelete